Beach grooming likely no longer regulated by Michigan; Federal rules still apply

Print More

Beach grooming in Bay City, Mich. Photo:

Michigan lakefront property owners who want to weed their Great Lakes beaches with mechanical devices may soon have one less hurdle to jump.

Gov. Rick Snyder is expected to soon sign a bill that will do away with state permits for grooming many Great Lakes beaches.

The state will continue to regulate beach grooming in environmentally sensitive areas. And everyone still needs a permit from the federal U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.

In 2007 Michigan lawmakers made it illegal for beach owners to clean their properties, beyond general maintenance, without applying for state and federal permits. Since then, beach owners have been fighting to repeal the law. General maintenance is considered raking or hand pulling vegetation. To use mechanical devices you need a permit.

“We talk about Pure Michigan, but if we can’t clean our beaches it won’t be safe for anyone to walk,” said Ernie Krygier, president of Save Our Shoreline —the group pushing the bill.

Michigan is the only state requiring both state and federal permits for grooming Great Lakes beaches. In Wisconsin a state permit is required to use mechanical grooming devices. Most Great Lakes states have state guidelines about removing vegetation.

Many Michigan beach owners believe they should have the right to clean their property without a permit — let alone two permits.

The change in the law was a long time coming for bill sponsor Sen. Tom Casperson, R-Escanaba, who has been following this issue for years. “I was dealing with it based on what I was getting from the beach owners in my district,” said Casperson, who serves 13 of the 15 counties in the Upper Peninsula. “They have been cleaning their beaches for years, and all of a sudden the rules changed and they couldn’t get any answers.”

His constituents were frustrated by having both state and federal officials unable to declare a high water mark, requiring them to hire a water expert instead. The high water mark is what separates the property owner’s land from government land— which is important for establishing property size and market value.

“I could see everyone rolling their eyes thinking, you got to be kidding me.” Casperson said.

Still, even with both state and federal requirements, only four permits were denied since 2007, according to the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality. About 500 permits have been approved since then.

Ernie Krygier using his tractor to clean up the beach. Photo:

Krygier says that’s more evidence that less regulation is necessary.

“There are 3,200 miles of shoreline and there are certainly more than 500 people who live there,” he said.

Though, that’s if you include inland lakes, which don’t apply to the grooming legislation.

Such few permits issued since 2007 likely means that most people quietly groom their beaches and avoid the permits all together, Krygier said.

Though federal officials will continue to regulate beach grooming, some environmental groups worry that the change will confuse people about whether a federal permit is still needed.

“People might hear that this was signed and think that they won’t need a permit at all, but that isn’t the case,” said James Clift, policy director at the Michigan Environmental Council, a coalition of state environmental organizations.

Or perhaps people aware that they need a permit may continue to maintain their beach without one.

Phragmites are a grass like invasive species that can grow to a height of 10 ft. Photo:

The right to remove invasive species like phragmites is a large issue on both sides of the argument. Many people want a permit to get rid of them. But improper phragmites removal could worsen the invasion of the plant that chokes wetlands and shorelines.

“The worst thing you can do is start chopping out phragmites,” said Sarah U’Ren, program director at the Watershed Center Grand Traverse Bay, Mich. “If you chop it, any root system you have will start growing back. That’s not the way to treat invasive species. You have to treat it properly.”

The state provides information online on proper phragmites removal.

A question in this debate was whether personal property rights should outweigh the need to protect Great Lakes ecosystems.

“Not all of the Great Lakes are meant to have a sandy shoreline,” U’Ren said. “The vegetation functions in a number of different ways.”

Among them:

  • The roots of the vegetation hold the sand in place, which can prevent erosion from waves and flood.
  • It shelters young fish, wildlife, waterfowl and amphibians.
  • It filters pollutants, especially excessive nutrients that might run off the land from fertilizers.
  • Native plants along the shoreline help prevent invasive species.
  • If water levels rise, the vegetation must be maintained to provide a healthy ecosystem for aquatic life.

The adverse environmental impact of beach grooming is undeniable, according to a study by the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality. It reports that there is less aquatic life and more ecosystem degradation around maintained beaches.

The Great Lakes support nearly 200 species of fish, 90 percent of which use coastal marshes at some point, according to the study.

“I don’t get why the state would give up its right to regulate its own shoreline.” U’Ren said.

7 thoughts on “Beach grooming likely no longer regulated by Michigan; Federal rules still apply

  1. Huron Beach; There were/are problems, particularly along Huron, Saginaw bay for instance. Not recognizing the problem is not the same as not having one.
    80% of the phragmites lives beneath the surface. Every single piece that is broken will sprout a new phragmite rhyzome. They are prolific, strangle out anything native, change the support system for native bugs/fish/reptiles and have quite far reaching effect. They are also very expensive to manage. Phragmites are not so slowly and very surely taking over many smaller inland lakes as well as filling in bays and lakeshores. This can have a tremendous negative impact on fisheries, which are big but declining money in the state from recreational fishing, who are seeing decline of fishery stores. I understand that property owners need to be able to address maintenance on their property and the state is inefficient in administering permits, but if not a permit, a manditory training should be in effect to assure practices undertaken by homeowners doesn’t make a complex and difficult problem worse, and create circumstances that are near impossible to recover from.

  2. Nobody is talking about altering the shore line of what’s in the water. We’re talking miles of high and dry sand beautiful white sand that was being cleaned for years without any problems. Then out of the blue comes lousy legislation saying the weeds were more important than the taxpayer and property owner. If I’m going to pay sky high property taxes for the beach, then I want a beach.

    Anybody got a link to the federal requirements?

  3. Thank you for pointing that out. The article has been corrected. We appreciate your input!

  4. This article is incorrect in stating that no other state requires a permit. Wisconsin DNR does in fact require permits for mechanical beach grooming under Wis. Stats. Chapter 30. An Individual permit is required unless it is for invasive species removal.

  5. Unfortunately, you missed the point with your article. This is nothing more than a contunuing attempt to weaken environmental regulations. Senator Casperson’s statements are misleading and meant as smoke and mirrors. This isn’t a property owner issue as represented in your report. The adjacent land owners do NOT own this land. This is Great Lakes bottomland held in truust by the State of Michigan for all of us who live in Michigan. While they would like to think it is their land to do what they want, it’s not. Unfortunately, with passage of this legislation, they can now do what they want regardless of the impacts and what we, the people of Michigan want. It’s a sad day for the Great Lakes and their valuable resources.

  6. Pingback: Michigan – Beach grooming likely no longer regulated by Michigan; Federal rules still apply – Great Lakes Echo | Coastal Engineering News & Subscription List

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.