Officials want Michigan to pay for wildfires

by Justine McGuire

Good neighbors pay to put out their fires.

Rep. Bob Genetski says he introduced the wildfire bill to help small, under-equipped localities. Photo: USFWS Headquarters/Flickr.

Rep. Bob Genetski says he introduced the wildfire bill to help small, under-equipped localities. Photo: USFWS Headquarters/Flickr.

That’s why Rep. Bob Genetski, R-Saugatuck, says he introduced a bill that would allow the state to compensate localities for fighting fires on state-owned land through the already-established Forest Development Fund.

“This is state land and the state needs to be ta

king care of it,” he said. “It’s to the point where the state is a terrible neighbor.”

The Department of Natural Resources (DNR) does have fire crews and says on its website that it has the overall responsibility for wildfires. It also receives help from the U.S. Forest Service and local fire departments.

The forest fund currently can pay only for principal and interest on bonds and notes, reforestation, forest protection, timber stand improvement, and maintaining sustainable forestry standards, under state law.

Genetski said his bill would not require additional state money, but would make the existing funds available — as a second priority after principal and interest payments — to reimburse local governments.

The problem came to Genetski’s attention because Allegan County’s Valley Township — a locality that is about 60 percent state land — fought a fire that erupted in the Allegan State Game Area in the township a couple years ago, he said.

“The township is so small that it doesn’t have its own fire department,” he said.

Neighboring departments were dispatched to put out the fire, but Valley had to pay for the services. Since then, the township has tried to recoup its costs from the state, which has been less than helpful, Genetski said.

Brandee Ellis, township clerk, said, “We have so much DNR land and we’re not allowed to recover that money. We’re a small township, so something like that could be very detrimental.”

The 2010 fire that cost the township about $3,000, which came out of its fire budget of about $70,000, Ellis said.

“When we can’t recover that money and $3,000 comes out of our millage, it hurts,” she said.

She added that fire wasn’t the only time the township paid other departments to fight fires on state land, but the other incidents cost much less.

Michigan Townships Association Executive Director Larry Merrill said reimbursing local governments for fighting forest fires wouldn’t be too expensive for the state.

“It’s a huge burden to the local government that has firefighters out there for four or five days,” Merrill said.

The president of the Michigan Association of Fire Chiefs, Bill Forbush, said he hadn’t heard complaints from local officials.

“I don’t think it’s a huge problem in this area,” said Forbush, who is also Alpena fire chief. “The DNR comes out right away and we work side-by-side and we really enjoy that partnership. We all count on the DNR when these forest fires happen.”

But, he added, forest fires are more routinely fought by local departments because a DNR fire crew isn’t always nearby.

So far in 2013, the DNR has responded to 52 wildfires in the Upper Peninsula and 194 in the Lower Peninsula. About 179 acres have burned in the UP and 553 in the Lower Peninsula.

In 2012, it responded to 469 wildfires, compared to 246 so far in 2013.

However, that’s not a complete list of incidents on state land because the DNR doesn’t respond to every fire, said Scott Heather, assistant chief of fire operations for the department.

“Ninety-three percent of all wildfires are caused by people,” Heather said. “Since there are more people in the Lower Peninsula, there are more fires.”

The chiefs association has not taken a formal position on the bill, nor has the DNR.

Geneski said he hasn’t heard of complaints in other areas, but said it probably is a problem in the UP where there is an abundance of state land.

The bill is in the House Appropriations Committee. No hearing is scheduled.

WILDFIRES

2 thoughts on “Officials want Michigan to pay for wildfires

  1. As we saw with the Duck Lake fire, Michigan can have major forest fires. Do you have a breakdown on how that was paid for? There is no way that the Brimley-area had the funds to cover that or did that get so large that fire crews were paid by the State? That was more than just the DNR crew.

    I think there is a bigger issue here, more specifically, what will occur at the national level. At our current rate of fighting fires, we cannot fund fire prevention or reforestation efforts. That is a major issue. Will we (Michigan) be requested to pay for California’s, Colorado’s, (insert Western state here)’s problem?

  2. Do the local units of government want to reimburse the state when the DNR fights fires on non-state lands?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>