Michigan governor to revive water advisory board

Photo: Chris Happel (flickr)

Photo: Chris Happel (flickr)

Citing concerns about a changing climate, Michigan Gov. Rick Snyder today is expected to outline a plan to re-establish an advisory board on water use.

His press office declined to comment in detail on the plan until after the governor describes his vision for the body in his State of the State address at 7 p.m. tonight.

Earlier this week the governor said that in addition to economic and environmental concerns, changes in the state’s climate necessitated the council’s formation, according to the Mlive news service.

“I think we’re going to see more challenges with variations of climate,” Mlive quoted Snyder as saying at the Michigan Agri-Business Association conference in Lansing. “I’m not getting into why it happens, but I think we’re going to see a more challenging climate over the next decade or two, potentially with drought challenges and everything else.”

The council, comprised of a variety of Michigan water stakeholders including environmental groups, businesses, utilities, scientists, and communities, has been called upon several times in past years, according to the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality.

“Last year, for example, we had a council in response to the water use conflicts in southwest Michigan,” said department spokesperson Brad Wurfel. “This one will see a more statewide focus. It’s looking at a broader suite of opportunities and challenges.”

Convening this council plays into the governor’s statements that water is and will continue to be a major factor in why people come to Michigan, Wurfel said. “We’re the Great Lakes state, after all. Water’s a huge part of what it means to be in Michigan.”

This iteration of the council will deal with water quality and quantity, Wurfel said. While lake levels drop, there has been increased demand for water from a growing agricultural and business base. One of the primary purposes of the council will be to preempt water use issues that could arise from increasing demand for it.

Environmental groups supported the move.

“We’re pleased he reinstated it,” said Hugh McDiarmid, communications director for the Michigan Environmental Council. “Perhaps nowhere else in the world is water so important. It defines Michigan, and it’s important we have a lot of smart people looking at water use.

Susan Harley, policy director for Clean Water Action Michigan, agreed.

“I definitely think that a body that oversees our water use in the state is very important,” she said.

Convening the council is only the beginning of addressing Michigan’s water issues, Harley said. “We have a tool out there already, the Water Withdrawal Assessment Tool, that a lot of people really support. “This is a database where large water users register their water use and lets the state keep track of our water resources. A lot of holes have developed in that tool, however, and they need to be addressed.”

Inaccuracies in the database result from some large water users not being required to log water use, she said. That includes mining companies that employ hydraulic fracking and that are required to look at their water use but do not have to register with the tool.

They need to rework the tool and make sure all water users face the same rules, she said. And the state needs more environmental staff to ensure water issues can be dealt with in a timely manner.

“It’s great to oversee our large water users,” she said, “but if we’re really going to address the issue let’s do it in a holistic way so we’re not just putting a band-aid on the problem.”

The Water Withdrawal Assessment Tool, established in 2008, is a product of a previous iteration of the water use advisory council.

  • Anonymous

    Also look at what Canadian Neighbouring governments are about to do within miles of Lake Huron..
    2 Nuke Dumps!

  • Gerard Santoro

    As Program Mananger for Land & Water Resources and the Macomb County Blue Economy Initiative; I must state that one of SE MI strongest sectors of our economy is being greatly effected by the very low water levels in part due to lack of ice cover and greater evaporation over a longer period of the year.

    We at the Lake St. Clair Tourism Initiative are very concerned and have some suggestions as to the availability and necessity for greater opportunity for dredging of public water channels for the recreational and fishing industries.

  • Truth only

    Please remove political & philosophical blinders and actually look at the facts. Regarding water, Nestle and the other 60+ bottled water companies IN MICHIGAN, are no different than the MANY soft drink, beer, wine, baby food, food processing/canning, farms, golf courses, ski resorts, manufacturers, etc. etc. that use water for profit. Why on earth would you make a distinction between a use that incorporates water into a product versus one that sells it straight???

    I stand corrected – there is one difference: the amount of water bottled is a MINISCULE FRACTION of that used, sold, evaporated etc. by any single one of these other industries.

    The point about the need for a bottle deposit is valid, but completely absurd to limit it to water. You do realize all non-carbonated beverage containers are exempt from the deposit law.

  • Jon

    Tammy, The corruption of the Republican Engler administration allowed the big money contributor Nestle to start the draining of the Great Lakes with their toe hold in Michigan. That was later followed by Republicans Pattie Burkholtz, Deb Muchmore, Dennis Muchmore, and Bill Rustem helping Nestle’ Ice Mountain to commercially sell off the Great Lakes outside the basin with their 4.5Gal containers totally exempt from any bottle deposits. If a small bottle has a old fashion dime deposit, then the deposits should be increased for inflation, and the Nestle’s 4.5Gal should have a deposit of several dollars in proportion! However, the corrupt Snyder Republican politicians are always supportive of screwing Michigan out of millions of dollars on behalf of their water plastic polluters.

  • Tammy Hibner

    What about limiting what Nestle out of the great lakes to bottle & sale?