Fur dealers could trap beavers under proposed law change

Print More
Photo: Steve Hersey.

Although concrete statistics are hard to compile, experts say the beaver population is healthy and has grown. Photo: Steve Hersey.

By Danielle Woodward
Capital News Service

LANSING — Licensed fur dealers could trap beavers under legislation recently introduced by lawmakers.

The Michigan Trappers and Predator Callers Association pushed for the legislation that is sponsored by Sen. Thomas Casperson, R-Escanaba.

Beavers can be trapped now, but this measure would allow fur dealers to trap- something that has been outlawed at least as far back as the early 1900s.

“It is a law that we don’t need anymore,” said Scott Harbaugh, director for the trapper association’s northern Lower Peninsula region. “It was to keep the fur buyer from adding more beaver to his lot by using the bag limit of another seller, but now we have no bag limit on beaver trapping.”

Before it was removed in 1983, the limit was 25 beavers per person, said Adam Bump, the Michigan Department of Natural Resources bear and furbearer specialist.

That agency requested that the trappers push for this change to the law.

“This was created in a time when beaver population needed to be increased and the intent was to make it harder for beavers to be harvested,” Bump said.

There are no exact statistics for changes in beaver population, Bump said. They are difficult to track, but the population is now healthy and has grown considerably since the prohibition against fur dealers trapping was made.

In the 1800s and 1900s fur buyers put a seal on the pelts to track how many animals were harvested. They kept an eye on beaver population since there was so few of them, Southworth said.

“We don’t need a bag limit to appropriately manage the population so it would be an easy way to allow a few more people to get out and trap beavers if they wanted to,” Bump said.

Trapping keeps the population of each animal down so they don’t overpopulate and end up with diseases that can spread to humans, Harbaugh said.

“Fur is still a warm means of clothing so most trappers do it to get them out of areas where there are too many and make money in the process by selling the fur to help pay for what we do,” he said.

A small beaver pelt can be worth around $20 and a large one about $50, said Dale Hendershot, president of the trappers association.

“Most people just do beaver trapping as a hobby because it is kind of hard to make a living off of it,” he said. “However, those that do make a living off of it trap multiple species and make supplies as well.”

Trappers sell to fur dealers, who sell to larger corporations, Harbaugh said. China and Russia are the biggest buyers.

Not everybody is pleased with beaver trapping.

“Declaring open season on beavers just so fur trappers can make a pretty penny is senseless and just cruel,” said Kristin Simon, senior cruelty caseworker for People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, an animal rights organization.

“Trapping is a conservation practice to keep wildlife numbers high so more animals can be killed for recreation or commercial purposes over the long term,” Simon said. “Often trapping gets counted as good for the environment but beavers are essential to the environment.”

Harbaugh insists that beaver trapping benefits the ecosystem as well.

“In a perfect world nobody would have to do any of that stuff but you have to keep the ecosystem from getting overpopulated so its either we do what we do or nature makes it horrible and the death takes longer because the animals get sick,” he said.

Beavers pose a nuisance to humans by damming up waterways, which can flood farmers’ fields and roads and do a significant amount of damage, Hendershot, said.

“Lately there has been a spike in beavers, especially in the Lansing area, so you don’t have to worry about them going extinct anytime soon,” Southworth said.

Beavers create dams that purify water, homes for other animals and reduce flooding, Simon said.

The bill is in the Senate Outdoor Recreation and Tourism Committee.

3 thoughts on “Fur dealers could trap beavers under proposed law change

  1. We should never again make it lawful to trap beavers. I live in Indiana near three rivers and I still haven’t seen one beaver although I have heard stories that they’re there. If Lansing has a local problem, let them handle it. When I lived in Pennsylvania, we visited the state park every year and my children saw these beautiful animals and we were able to learn all about these beautiful animals and how industrious they are. They are truly nature’s engineers. Why do we need to make China and Russia richer? There are people in this country who are starving. Let us not deplete our own natural resources by killing the beavers which God gave us.

  2. As a child, I had the experience of checking traps, with my father and grandfather. These were entirely for food, but, regardless of how often the traps were checked, the suffering of the animals, while they waited for the last blow, will remain with me always.

  3. Trapping is indiscriminate, cruel, and causes intentional suffering. Individual trappers already commercialize native wildlife to make a buck, but by all means, let’s go back to the days when unregulated commercial trapping drove beavers to near extinction and altered ecosystems.

    It would be hard to come up with a statement more arrogant and lame than this:
    “In a perfect world nobody would have to do any of that stuff but you have to keep the ecosystem from getting overpopulated so its either we do what we do or nature makes it horrible and the death takes longer because the animals get sick,” he said.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.