As Michigan wind farms expand, protests increase

Print More

By CAITLIN McARTHUR

Image: Alliant Energy Michigan

Image: Alliant Energy Michigan

Michigan is on pace to meet its renewable energy targets, largely thanks to wind power, but issues of transparency and turbine placement have some asking whether the shift towards wind is a smart one.

The Great Lakes State is well on its way to drawing 10 percent of its energy from renewable sources by the end of the year, as required by a 2008 law.

Public Service Commission (PSC) communications specialist Judy Palnau said that achievement was thanks to a huge effort from utilities, with wind farms and turbines going up across the state.
To date, Michigan has 18 operational wind farms with another two in development, according to PSC’s wind farms map.

Image: Michigan Public Service Commission

Image: Michigan Public Service Commission

The primary location for wind energy in the state is Huron County because of its wind capacity. With nearly half of the state’s wind turbines already in the area, proposals for further expansion this year have the county reviewing a proposed moratorium.

Other counties in the state’s Thumb area are also considered prime sites by the utility companies, with the tip of the Thumb alone home to more than 300 turbines.

“The number-one type of renewable energy to reach that goal in Michigan has proven to be wind,” Palnau said.

With Michigan still getting 54 percent of its energy from coal, the Sierra Club is fully behind the state’s move toward wind energy, said Michigan Chapter Conservation Director Anne Woiwode.

“It’s an extremely valuable source of energy that provides clean, safe electric power,” Woiwode said. “Wind power is evolving, the price has been dropping, because it is very inexpensive way to create electric power as compared to fossil fuel generation.”

According to the American Wind Energy Association, the cost of wind energy has dropped 43 percent in the last four years.

Utility companies have passed these savings onto consumers, with DTE Energy reducing its surcharge from $3 per month to 43 cents this year while Consumers Energy eliminated it altogether, according to a 2014 Public Service Commission report.

Despite the savings, some argue the downside associated with wind power outweigh the benefits.

Residents who live near turbines complain of noise and flickering — a strobing effect – which occurs when the sun sits behind the turbine blades.

In Huron County, Brookfield Township Clerk Michael Lorencz said there’s a turbine just a mile from his house.

“The flicker off the blade at sunrise and sunset when the sun shines through casts a big shadow with a pulsating effect,” Lorencz said. “I have noise and I have the strobe effect. I don’t think developers took that into consideration.”

A lack of community consultation regarding turbine siting and zoning ordinances has left some residents calling for more transparency and filing lawsuits. A group of residents in the Upper Peninsula, for instance, filed a lawsuit in January against Traverse City-based utility Heritage Sustainable Energy and the U.S. government to stop expansion of a wind farm they say has caused more disruption than was promised, the Associated Press reported.

Consumers Energy settled a lawsuit with 19 plaintiffs in October in Mason County over the operation of Lake Winds Energy Park near Ludington, according to press reports. Plaintiffs were seeking closure of the wind park, complaining of sleeplessness, headaches, dizziness and economic loss.

The Sierra Club’s Woiwode acknowledged that wind farms have caused hardships for some people.

“Wind is a valuable part of our energy uses, but it’s not always right to put wind everywhere and some of the older designs may have had problems,” Woiwode said.

How residents react to wind farms and turbines depends on how they are treated in the process, she said.

“Where we have seen developments with less care and concern and consultation, we have seen more opposition,” Woiwode said. “There is no universal approach, but there clearly are better approaches that involve people early in the process.”

The American Wind Energy Association recently held a conference on the future of wind energy at Michigan State University’s Kellogg Center.

The State Wind Energy Forum, which explored the benefits and challenges facing the wind industry, played host to industry and government leaders and experts.

While future policy was discussed inside, outside, the Interstate Informed Citizens Council, a grassroots organization of citizens from across Michigan concerned about the actions and impact of the wind industry, protested the industry’s continuing expansion in the state.

The group’s director and Lenawee County resident Kevon Martis said members’ biggest objection to wind farming in rural Michigan was turbine location in relation to local residences.

“They measure from the foundation of a neighboring home rather than from the fence line,” he said. “With that you get flickering, you get noise, you get loss of amenity and destruction of view.”

Michigan is too permissive in its regulation of wind turbines, Martis said, which has led to citizen pushback.

Martis said when it comes to zoning and regulation, Michigan had a permissive history and is starting to see the effects of that in public reaction.

“The more experience people have with wind farms,” Martis said, “the greater regulatory burden they demand to be placed upon them.”

5 thoughts on “As Michigan wind farms expand, protests increase

  1. If one has to choose between centralized nuclear and coal and natural gas—the choice then becomes clear: Renewable energy technologies, when installed properly, are the most sustainable choice for electrical generation. A single coal or nuclear plant use millions of gallons of water daily. Nuclear plants have long-term waste and ongoing security issues; natural gas provides no climate solution, while coal adds carcinogenic (and radioactive) emissions to the atmosphere. Is more research and advanced simulation needed for our sustainable energy future? Yes— but we now are working in the urgent category. Make thoughtful and conscious decisions with seven generations and all species in mind.

  2. These supposedly “grass roots” organizations are essentially spitting in to the wind, as informed citizens realize a clean, local source of energy sits right in our laps. And although the concern for wildlife is truly touching, I suppose we should start dismantling the real culprits to our winged friends, power lines, cars, buildings and the #1 threat…. cats.

  3. There is so much wrong here: “…the Sierra Club is fully behind the state’s move toward wind energy, said Michigan Chapter Conservation Director Anne Woiwode.”

    The Sierra Club continues to push wind despite the fact that hundred of turbines litter the landscape of Huron County, MI– a major bird/bat migration bottleneck through which pass 100s of thousands of nocturnal migrants pass through each spring and fall– including 35,000+ raptors. Sierra Club founder, John Muir, must be turning in his grave. Monica Essenmacher, Head, Port Crescent Hawk Watch.

  4. Dear Anonymous:

    Thanks for the high praise. Your unfounded claim that IICC is not a grassroots organization is an obvious admission that we are so effective we must have some ‘dark’ funding source.

    We do not.

    But if anyone does want to help fund our efforts to promote energy policy that is economical, environmentally friendly and socially responsible there is a link on our website for donations: http://www.iiccusa.org

    And for more of our message watch this video:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d8RhtZv_8Oc

    Kevon Martis
    Volunteer Director
    IICC

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.