Low water levels lead to more phragmites

The St. Clair River in May, 2001. Lake St. Clair was down a little over a foot that month. Photo: NOAA
The lower the water in the Great Lakes, the larger the stretch of uncovered shoreline for phragmites to invade.
And the longer water levels stay low, the easier it is for this prolific invasive plant to crowd out native plants and form a thick mat of reeds that covers shorelines
Lower water levels in the Great Lakes starting in 1999 coincide with an increase of phragmites in the region’s wetlands, according to a recent study in the Journal of Great Lakes Research.
The study tracked the effects of changing water levels in the Great Lakes on wetland vegetation. It measured plant populations on Dickinson Island in the Lake St. Clair river delta and at Fish Point in Lake Huron.
Low water levels expose soil and give buried plant seeds the room to grow and spread. High water levels drown them out. When that cycle gets thrown out of whack, certain species move in and take over.
Fluctuating water levels control phragmites and other wetland plant species, said Douglas Wilcox, a professor of wetland science at The College of Brockport, State University of New York, who completed the study.
It’s the low levels that seem to matter though.
Wilcox compared two low water level periods and found a large difference in the spread of phragmites. The species moved onto Dickinson Island when water levels dropped in 1988. But there wasn’t a dramatic increase in population until after water levels dropped again in 1999.
The difference comes from the amount of exposed soil. One surveyed section on the island lost water from 25 percent of its surface area in 1988; in 1999 it lost water from 75 percent. The increase of soil exposure at Fish Point was even more dramatic. Thirty percent of the surveyed area was exposed in 1988, but 100 percent was exposed in 1999.
Low lake levels in 1999 are responsible for the increase in vegetation, Wilcox said. “We had wetlands restoration at no cost to the taxpayer.
“The disadvantage is that now nature has to deal with invasive species.”
Right now there is a trend of low water levels in the Great Lakes. That’s bad news, according to Wilcox.
“We need high lake levels to control phragmites, he said.”
The U.S. Army Corp of Engineers recognizes the trend from water level averages taken from 1918 to present.
“Lakes Superior, Huron and Michigan are at the longest stretch of lower water levels in recorded history,” said Keith Kompoltowicz, the chief of watershed hydrology for the Corps’ Detroit district.
He attributes fluctuating levels to fluctuating levels of snowfall and spring rain.
“Snow fall is the largest determining factor to whether or not waters rise in the spring,” Kompoltowicz said.
Based on historical lake level patterns, water levels should have come up already, Wilcox said. But Great Lakes water levels are driven by climate.
A consensus of scientists point to increasing evidence of global warming caused by the burning of fossil fuels. That warming in turn could affect lake levels.
Warmer winters mean less ice and that can lead to more evaporation, Wilcox said.
Water levels in the Great Lakes coincide with Earth’s geologic history, he said. “We had high lake levels in the little ice age, and we had low lake levels in the medieval warm period.”
Because low water levels aren’t something that people can just fix, watershed groups have had to get creative in their
methods of phragmites removal.
In Grand Traverse County, Mich., it’s controlled with a “Glove of Death.”
Licensed contractors spray a glove with an herbicide and selectively swipe the phragmites with it.
“You do this so you don’t kill native plants like bulrushes,” said Sara U’Ren, the program director at the Watershed Center Grand Traverse Bay.
The area began using the herbicide after experiencing five years of an ever-increasing phragmites population.
“We saw it increase in areas with lower water levels and in areas with exposed bottom land,” U’Ren said. “We haven’t had high water levels in a long time.”
Phragmites starts on the shoreline, but if left untreated or uncontrolled it can move out to deeper water, said Maureen McManus, a program associate.
The plant’s roots can grow out 30 feet into the water every year. Those roots float until they form a mat that sinks to the bottom of the water. Anecdotal evidence there suggests that phragmites doesn’t like to be in over two to three feet of water.
She considers the area lucky for having caught it early on. After two years of treatment, the county has seen an 80 percent reduction in the plant’s population.


Phragmites is growing in lots of places not affected by G Lakes water levels. Drive the Ohio Turnpike. It’s in every ditch. Huge problem that few people are even aware of.
Like or Dislike:
1
0
Why does the graph combine Lake Michigan and Huron? Is there too much shared water to get an accurate and separate reading of levels? If not, it seems misleading.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
If you go to the U.S. Army Corp of Engineers website, where they post daily Great Lakes water levels, you will see that Lakes Michigan and Huron are combined. They, and NOAA, consider them one lake because they come together at the Straits of Mackinac. There are other reasons for this as well, which both of their websites can explain in-depth.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
Thank you, Sara.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
Disagree. 2 years ago the lake huron froze solid all the way across. The lake level was still down. Rumors of asian super tankers filling their tanks with fresh water and bringing it home seems to make more sense.
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1170/is_1999_August-July/ai_54864442/
Like or Dislike:
0
4
Leave your response!
Interact
Special Reports
Recent Comments
“Conservatively, colder winters are associated with ice sheets...”
Photo Friday: Minnesota lakes take their time “icing out”
“In liberal speak, the late ice out in Minnesota and the overall...”
Photo Friday: Minnesota lakes take their time “icing out”
“The financial success of undertakings involving construction are derived from safety,...”
Restoring the Great Lakes 2.0: Keep it simple
“Here is another one for Gary. The Muskegon Lake AOC is another classic example of GLRI...”
Restoring the Great Lakes 2.0: Keep it simple
“Gary Wilson is correct. Ironically not all advisory boards follow their own missions....”
Restoring the Great Lakes 2.0: Keep it simple
GLIN News archive
Submit a story
Great Lakes Tweets
Other Resources
Most Commented
Who We Are
Great Lakes Echo is a project of the Knight Center for Environmental Journalism at Michigan State University.
Additional content provided by MSU's Capital News Service.
Technical assistance by MSU's Department of Telecommunications, Information Studies and Media with support from the Michigan Agricultural Experiment Station.