By Steven Maier
Scientists may have settled a debate between anglers and fishery managers over the future of the lake trout in the Great Lakes.
With salmon hauls on the decline in recent years as their favorite food dwindles, anglers are anxious to prioritize their protection even over recently resurgent native populations like lake trout.
Salmon reigned as the undisputed king of the Great Lakes fishing industry for decades after they were introduced in the 1950s to curb the invasive alewife. It was around that time that the highly lucrative lake trout fishery took a dive as populations crashed.
Alewife populations, the salmon’s key food source, have dwindled in recent years. Now anglers are afraid that the lake trout’s comeback could hasten the salmon’s disappearance and compete for the few alewife that are left, said Jory Jonas, a fisheries research biology specialist with the Michigan Department of Natural Resources.
But that’s not necessarily true. Jonas is the co-author of a new study showing that lake trout eat whatever’s available, meaning they don’t always directly compete for food with species like the Chinook salmon.
Both species mainly consumed alewife for years, Jonas said. That’s still true of most of the lake trout in Lake Michigan, where alewife populations are more stable. But though they’ve lost a main source of food, the lake trout’s flexible diet may make them beneficiaries after all.
“Nothing is ever truly good or bad,” she said. “It’s always a mix.”
Alewife consumption was probably harming lake trout eggs, said Austin Happel, who co-authored the diet study as a doctoral candidate at the University of Illinois. He’s now an instructor at Colorado State University.
Lake trout reproduction in the Great Lakes has been handcuffed for years due to chronically low levels of thiamine, a fat-binding agent key to a healthy egg membrane, according to the study.
Fish have to consume a healthy ratio of fat and thiamine to lay viable eggs–alewife are fatty and often low in thiamine, Happel said.
The goal for lake trout is self-sufficiency, he said. That’s not the reality these days. Lake trout have to be stocked for populations to survive.
The Great Lakes Fishery Commission seeks to protect native species like lake trout, said Marc Gaden, the commission’s communications director. But the agency is also pleased with each state’s efforts to save the salmon by growing the remaining alewife population.
“They have to take on this elephant in the room, which is that there’s not much food for the salmon to eat,” Gaden said.
Fishery managers face a balancing act. They need to support the alewife enough to meet the demand for salmon, while rooting against it–and in favor of other prey species–in the interests of the native lake trout.
The diets of lake trout differ drastically between lakes Michigan and Huron, and even between the east and west coasts of Lake Michigan. This kindles some hope for that balance managers need to protect both the salmon and lake trout, Jonas said.
The variation is consistent with availability – alewife in northern Lake Michigan still make up a large portion of lake trout diet, while the Lake Huron fish consume the more-abundant rainbow smelt. A booming population of round goby, another invasive, is now an important food source for lake trout in western Lake Michigan.
But Happel said the alewife’s downturn won’t necessarily solve lake trout reproduction troubles. Thiamine deficiency has been found in other Great Lakes fish that don’t eat alewife–meaning the alewife might not be the crux of that problem.
“At some point we wanted to point fingers,” he said. “We wanted to find a culprit.”
Scientists have turned the log over only to find a larger problem–the entire food web in the Great Lakes is full of fat with not much thiamine to offset it, Happel said.
Alewife are a large part of the problem, but Jonas said prey like rainbow smelt are also low in thiamine to a lesser extent. The good news: round goby don’t share that problem. Researchers could start seeing higher natural reproduction among lake trout in goby-rich territory like Lake Mchigan’s western shore.
Happel said the study is encouraging. If lake trout can diversify their diet–and with it, their vitamin intake–the odds look much better for reproduction.
Interesting.
Touch one part and another is affected. Haven’t eaten Lake Trout in a while.
Just now figuring out that lake trout will eat just about anything? Unfortunately, lakers out of Lake Michigan are greaseballs. Need to keep the salmon/steelhead fisheries alive for many, many reasons.
As a conservationist, I’m in the minority on this issue, but I think we ought to let the lakes evolve. They’re “only” 15,000 years old–a blink in geological time. There are many more ecological niches to be discovered and filled. It is not unusual for invasives to explode in population, but even invasive populations eventually find equilibrium. Case in point: this orange Asian beetle is shrinking in population and I’m seeing more of the red ladybugs they initially displaced.
Lake trout have been naturally reproducing for some time, as first reported here: http://www.outdoornews.com/2013/04/18/lake-michigan-lake-trout-now-reproducing-naturally/