Hormones from livestock operations may skew fish gender



Fathead minnows raised in water from manure-tainted Indiana streams were more likely to be male than those raised in uncontaminated water. Photo: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.

Baby fish exposed to hormone-laden manure from Indiana farms were much more likely to be male than those raised in uncontaminated water, according to new research.

The findings add to evidence that farm runoff may alter fish hormones and affect their reproduction and development.

Purdue University researchers raised fathead minnow embryos in water taken from two Indiana streams that are contaminated with natural and synthetic hormones from manure spread on fields. The embryos turned out 60 percent male; fish typically are born with roughly equal numbers of males and females.

Over time this skewing toward male fish could “drop fish populations,” said Maria Sepulveda, an assistant professor at Purdue’s department of forestry and natural resources and lead author of the study. She was quick to warn, however, that other factors — water temperature, nutrients and pesticides — also may influence fish gender.

Livestock excrete natural hormones — estrogens and testosterones — as well as synthetic ones used to bolster their growth. Depending on concentrations and fish sensitivity, these hormones and hormone mimics might impair wild fish reproduction or skew their sex ratios.

“This type of study was long overdue,” said Luke Iwanowicz, a research biologist with the U.S. Geological Survey who did not participate in the Purdue research. “Anytime you see skewed sex ratios and population effects, it’s concerning.”

Hormones were found in 80 percent of the water samples taken at two agricultural streams in central Indiana, compared with no hormones at a nearby creek unexposed to manure runoff. The agricultural streams contained both natural and synthetic hormones.

The maximum hormone loads (from the manure to the streams) are taking place during the spring, which coincides with fish spawning, hatching and developing,” the authors wrote in the study, which was published online in November in the journal Environmental Science and Technology.

The agricultural streams also had 50 percent less fish diversity and a 28 percent higher adult minnow death rate than the creek with no farm runoff, according to the study.

Sepulveda said the lack of diversity and death rates in the agricultural waterways were expected given the poorer water quality and habitat.

But the increased male birth rates were surprising, and fish sex ratios are “too often overlooked,” said Thea Edwards, an assistant professor of biological sciences at Louisiana Tech University, “especially since we’re seeing more and more manure runoff and hormones in the water.”

While 60 percent of the fish raised in the manure-tainted water were male, only 48 percent of those raised in the non-contaminated water were male. There were slightly more non-hormone contaminants, such as pesticides and nutrients, in the agricultural streams than in the uncontaminated creek, but it was not a significant difference.

Confined animal feeding operations produce a lot of manure full of hormones and antibiotics. Photo: Environmental Protection Agency.

Nevertheless, there are some limitations to the connection the scientists found to manure runoff. While the study focused on hormones, the interaction of all contaminants could be linked to birth rates and fish diversity, Sepulveda said. And fish could have moved in and out of the sites, so it is unclear how frequently they were exposed.

The water from the agricultural streams had more testosterone than estrogen but researchers cannot associate any class of hormones with a specific birth outcome or developmental effect, said Ed Orlando, an assistant professor in the department of animal and avian sciences at the University of Maryland.

However, previous research supports a possible connection between the high rate of male births and the contaminated water.

The same synthetic hormone, trenbolone, detected at high levels in the Indiana streams was linked to an all-male population of zebrafish in a 2006 laboratory study by University of Southern Denmark researchers. In addition, a study led by Orlando in 2004 found male minnows in a stream near a confined animal feeding operation had lower than average testosterone and were sexually immature.

Researchers do not know, however, if wild fish populations in agricultural streams have skewed male-female ratios, and whether their fertility has been reduced.

Many animals are implanted with synthetic steroid hormones such as trenbolone, melengestrol and zeranol to make them bigger, improve breeding and increase milk production in cattle. And it works: In 1920, a chicken took about 16 weeks to reach 2.2 lbs., whereas now they can reach five pounds in seven weeks, according to a report from the National Association of Local Boards of Health.

But the practice has spurred controversy as consumer groups have expressed concern over synthetic hormones increasingly getting into food and water supplies.

The manure in the new research came from cattle, dairy, pig and poultry confined animal feeding operations, which are farms with large numbers of animals. In Indiana that means 700 dairy cows, 500 horses, 55,000 turkeys or other combinations.

Indiana has about 625 confined animal feeding operations, which produce 80 percent of the state’s livestock, according to the state’s Department of Environmental Management.

Runoff and drainage systems allow manure to flow from farms to streams. Photo: United States Department of Agriculture.

Depending on the type, such farms produce between 2,800 tons and 1.6 million tons of manure a year, according to a report by the U.S. Government Accountability Office.

Some livestock operations sell manure to nearby farmers to fertilize fields — an easy, useful way to get rid of it. Some farmers, including the ones near the streams in the new study, have drains to keep water in the fertilized soil at a desired level. When there’s too much water, it goes down the drain and gets into nearby watersheds.

Each state has its own regulations. Greg Slipher, a livestock specialist with the Indiana Farm Bureau, said that Indiana livestock operations are required to be set back from water — about 100 feet from most water and 500 feet from public water supplies.

Neither Slipher nor representatives from the American Farm Bureau Federation would comment on the new findings.

Iwanowicz, who said he was not speaking for the U.S. Geological Survey, said current regulations aren’t enough.

“We’re increasingly seeing biologically active chemicals getting into our water,” he said. “There is enough data to show that there should be more efforts to minimize that.”

Fish sex determination is complicated and it would be difficult to pin it on one thing, Edwards said. But policymakers should take notice, she said.

“We need to take a careful look at the agricultural practices we have in place, as there’s plenty of evidence that we’re destroying water quality,” Edwards said. “A 3-year-old could say ‘hey, this stream next to the farm does not look good’.”

Brian Bienkowski is a former Echo reporter now working for Environmental Health News where this story first appeared.


5 thoughts on “Hormones from livestock operations may skew fish gender

  1. Hi Brian, Yep lots of things “should be” Don’t mean they is. My fish farmer uses chicken manure, meat sraps and alfalfa, didn’t ask him if he asked about hormones he just said chicken manure was free.

  2. The reality is that the states that have a large economic interest in CAFOs really don’t give a damn where the shit goes as long as the money keeps rolling in. Chesapeake Bay is slowly dying from point source and non-point source CAFO pollution. There are ever growing areas of the Bay that have little or no oxygen, thus no life. Totally inadequate manure holding ponds have leaked or completely washed out into creeks and streams leading to the Bay. Manure spread on fields regularly washes, with every rain, into ditches, then creeks, then streams, then rivers into the bay. The environmental agencies of these states have been told to ignore this source of pollution, much as they ignore coal mining pollution in Appalachia. Money rules.

  3. Pingback: Hormones from livestock operations may skew fish gender toward males « Environmental News Bits

  4. Hi Tom, Manure used for zooplankton is — or should be — organic. The runoff from CAFOs carries manure from animals that have been fed synthetic hormones, most commonly trenbolone. This is a nascent research field, but the hypothesis is that it’s the synthetic hormones that may spur skewed sex ratios in fish.

  5. Mutant minnows, probably gonna need a special permit to fish with them. I get it about the pollution, but they use manure to generate the zooplankton to raise minnows and fish. Catch 22?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *