Neighboring states eye Michigan’s energy ballot proposal

Energy officials in neighboring states are watching to see if voters approve Michigan’s ballot proposal to get 25 percent of its electricity from renewable-energy sources by 2025.

If it passes, some say it ramps up a Great Lakes regional race for  renewable energy.

Michigan would become a leader among all Great Lakes states with such a renewable energy standard, said Steve Caminati, executive director of the Ohio Business Council for a Clean Economy.

It will definitely impact other Great Lakes states, including Ohio, Caminati said.

Others aren’t so sure.

“I don’t know if that’s what will happen or not,” said Doug Shoemaker, director of Minnesota Renewable Energy Association.

Great Lakes states are competing with each other and thinking about whether or not new standards are needed, depending on their own situations, he said.

“There is always cooperation in development,” Shoemaker said. “There is a rule for competition and there is also a rule for regional cooperation.”

Ohio’s 2009 law requires at least 12.5 percent of its electricity to come from renewable sources by 2025, he said. The state is one of the nation’s leaders in clean-energy jobs, employing about 25,000 people.

“If one neighboring state increases, other states need to step up,” Caminati said.

If Michigan’s proposal is passed, Ohio will probably lose its leading position among Great Lakes states, he said. And it could see one of its fastest-growing sources of jobs move north.

But Shoemaker from the Minnesota Renewable Energy Association doesn’t anticipate a jobs drain from his state.

Most jobs in Minnesota are taken by local residents, he said. The state lacks the resources to attract out-of-state investors.

People who moved from California to Minnesota to get involved in the state’s solar industry were disappointed, he said. “They didn’t know how small our solar industry is compared to California.

“Most people work here because their family is here,” he said.

Bob Vogl, director of the Illinois Renewable Energy Association, also downplays the impact of the Michigan proposal.

If the proposal passes, naturally people will go and find a job there, Vogl said.

“But that depends on a lot of factors,” he said. If people in Illinois can go wherever they want to find jobs, they will still consider Illinois as their first choice because they are Illinois residents.

Illinois has two main transmission lines within the state, according to Vogl. Those have been an important factor in development of Illinois’ renewable energy industry.

“I don’t see that Michigan is planning to build the power line to connect renewable energy to other states,” he said.

Caminati says cooperation is good.

“We are looking at a lot of industries that go beyond state borders,” he said. “We would like to see with Michigan’s proposal an increase demand of cooperation among different states.”

But competition is also good.

An increase in Michigan’s renewable energy industry will help Ohio companies along the border by forcing Ohio to improve its own renewable energy policy.

“As a organization we support what’s going on in Michigan,” he said. “Ohio can benefit from that but it also need to pay more attention to this area and step up.”

“At the end of the day we are also competing with each other,” Caminati said. “We need to see what we can do in Ohio and work with political lawmakers to make it happen.”

Advocates in Ohio introduced a proposal called “Yes for Ohio’s energy future” early this year. It suggested that the state spend $1.3 billion annually in clean energy from 2013-2023. It didn’t make it onto the ballot.

Minnesota lawmakers have introduced legislation to support the solar industry, Shoemaker said.

“We feel it is a opportunity, the fact is manufacturers don’t come to the state to offer jobs unless there is policy to promote it,” he said. “We will see what the state can do to assist our industry.”

Indiana doesn’t have a renewable energy standard yet, said Chris Maher, director of Indiana Renewable Energy Association.

“A lot of things are on hold right now waiting for the election to happen,” he said. “We are definitely looking forward to that.

“Based on the politics I don’t see any standard in couple of years.”

 

Related Stories:

Michigan ballot proposal: Energy and job years

 Energy policy by constitutional amendment debated

Federal renewable energy bill could leverage Michigan’s Prop. 3

  • Mike

    Clean energy is great but it has to be economy driven, not government mandate. Most “progressives” are still blind to the fact that governments are broke. Michigan is broke and the feds are broke. Subsidizing clean energy is just putting money on the credit card that has no money to pay the bill. So the consumers will have to pay the bill. Or, if you are an industry that relies on electricity to run the machines, you can move to or select a state with no government mandates, thus lower prices. Then the state with mandates lose again, and they go deeper in the hole from this additional loss to their economy.

  • Pingback: Today’s Energy News November 1, 2012