Michigan longterm beach water quality declines

Print More
BeachClosureGraphicBy Qing Zhang
Great Lakes Echo

Michigan has more than 1,200 public and nearly 500 private beaches.

Closing them or issuing safety advisories due to pollution has dropped the past three years.

“Surface water quality is generally showing improvement where programs are in place to correct problems and restore water quality,” according to the 2014 Integrated Report for Water Quality and Pollution Control in Michigan.

But taking the long view, parts of the state’s coastal environment may not be as promising as they appear.

“All our nearshore waters are at risk,” said Joan Rose, the director of the Water Quality and Environmental Microbiology Laboratory at Michigan State University. “No surprise, in urban areas things are more serious.”

Rose’s lab has studied cores of sediments from the bottom of Lake St. Clair and found that water

quality deteriorated over the past 100 years.

Joan Rose

The deeper the sediment, the older it is, Rose’s research team dug up to 2.8 feet in depth and got “one core (that) goes back to 1895 and the other to 1760.”

Her conclusion that the water is getting worse is based on measuring bacteria levels which were buried with the sediment.

“We also have actually monitoring data in one area from 60 years of data and it also shows deterioration,” Rose added.

E. coli is a bacteria used to set national and state health standards. Michigan counties have a long history of using the level of this bacterium as an indicator of beach water quality, said Sonia Joshi, the Ann Arbor-based outreach coordinator of Michigan Grant Sea.

But the method has deficiencies.

Measurement of E. coli usually takes 18 to 24 hours, which means the results can indicate only what the E. coli level was one day earlier. What’s more, considering E. coli is short-lived and its numbers fluctuate dramatically according to time and space, it is questionable whether the monitoring samples accurately represent the condition of a whole beach, according to both Rose and Joshi.

That’s why Ottawa County has stopped issuing closures and unsafe advisories, according to the county health department. People have to check water test results online themselves and decide whether to use a beach.

A more comprehensive and accurate way to monitor water quality is with a microbial source tracking tool, Rose said. It can find out the sources of pollution by matching its DNA information with the host of origin.

“Just like on CSI where they look for DNA at crime scenes we can do the same thing in water,” she said.

Another problem with the traditional testing standard is its lack of indicators for non-swimming water recreation activities such as fishing and boating. For example, on Aug. 26, 2013, the E. coli bacteria level at Maplewood Park in Ottawa County was 4.75 times higher than the national standard, but the day’s monitoring survey shows there were six people fishing there.

Therefore, Rose said, determining the causes of illnesses from “partial body contact” water recreation is of great significance, and “that’s definitely an area of interest in the future.”

Despite all these findings, Ottawa County Department of Public Health communication specialist Kristina Wieghmink said she didn’t see the water testing data has deterred people from going to county beaches, and the county had good beach attendance in 2013.

The public can find information about nearshore water quality in different parts of the state through online testing systems. Two popular ones are the BeachGuard System established by the DEQ and the beaches location and rating map set up by the Natural Resources Defense Council.

Related story

 Beach funding dwindles

One thought on “Michigan longterm beach water quality declines

  1. Since EPA never implemented the Clean Water Act (CWA) water quality in the nation’s open waters keep deteriorating.
    When EPA established sewage treatment standards in 1973, it used the BOD(Biochemical Oxygen Demand) test incorrect, by using only its 5-day value, in stead of its full 30-day value. By doing so EPA not only ignored 60% of the BOD pollution, but also all the nitrogenous (urine and protein) waste in sewage, while this waste also is a fertilizer for algae and for each pound will grow about 20 pound of algae. When the algae die they again exert an oxygen demand and will contribute to the dead zones we see in most open waters.
    Sadly all attempts to correct this test during the past 30 years failed, because nobody directly and even those indirectly (environmental groups and environmental reporters) involved is willing to admit that such a basic mistake was and still is made. They all hope that blaming, what is now called nutrient pollution, on the runoffs from farms and cities will solve the problems. There finally may be a change as a judge in September 2013 gave EPA six months to explain why urine is not required to be treated under the CWA. Nobody yet knows how EPA will respond and what the judge will do if they gain will try to coverup this mistake with legal bs or as what happened in te past by simple not respond at all.
    In such case it will depend on the media, who in the past has to kept this issue at arms length, not willing to get involved.
    The real sad part is that EPA already in 1978 in one of its report acknowledged that not only much better sewage treatment (including nitrogenous waste) was available,but could be build and operated at lower cost, compared to conventional sewage treatment, based on a more than century old technology, mostly developed to prevent odor problems. High time to hold EPA and everybody else involved accountable.m

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.