Ballast blaster: Repelling invaders with sound

Foreign plants and animals that threaten the Great Lakes ecology could soon be blown apart by ultrasound.

Professor Meiyin Wu and students testing out the BallastSolution. Photo: Mike Peters

A new device is designed to kill such invasive species lurking in the ballast tanks of ships.

Known as the BallastSolution, it kills invaders by blasting with sound the water entering and leaving a ship’s ballast.

Ballast water is pumped on and off ships to stabilize them for varying loads of cargo. It has brought invasive species into the Great Lakes for decades. The zebra and quagga mussels, and the round goby were introduced in this way, wreaking havoc on native species. The annual cost of controlling these species is in the millions.

On June 21 the U.S. Coast Guard will begin enforcing a requirement that ocean-going ships have an onboard method of treating ballast. It will affect all ships by 2017.

Right now ships that never leave the Great Lakes are exempt, but it may eventually apply to such “lakers” as well.

In testing, the sound device killed 99.9% of targeted species, said Meiyin Wu, an ecologist and an associate professor of biology at Montclair State University in New Jersey.

Wu and Junru Wu, a professor of physics at the University of Vermont, developed and built the device.

It uses electricity to generate ultrasound waves, she said.  A computer calculates how much energy to create to blast apart bacteria, plankton and small mollusks living in the ballast.

The project is partially funded by a grant from the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative, through the United States Department of Interior.

Vibration and heat produced during tests killed three different strains of e coli bacteria, water fleas and small Asian clams, Wu said

“The sound waves are energy, and energy vibrates gas bubbles in organisms,” she said. “These vibrating gas bubbles go through membranes; they break up into pieces.”

The gas particles expand which makes organisms burst, she said.  Simple exposure to the increased heat from the ultrasound waves also kills them.

It isn’t effective for larger mollusks or fish. The system targets smaller life forms that escape a ship’s filtration device needed for the larger organisms.

As the filtered water enters a ship’s ballast tank, it is disinfected by the ultrasound waves. It takes only seconds, but the sheer enormity of a ship’s ballast tank makes it necessary to treat water as it’s entering and leaving it, Wu said.

An up-close look at the BallastSolution. Photo: Mike Peters

The goal is to have ship owners install the technology into engine rooms, retrofitting plumbing and piping to make it fit.

The Coast Guard currently requires ships to exchange ballast water in mid-ocean in hopes of killing invasive species.  The new regulations require ships to treat water before it is exchanged.

“Saline shock is fairly effective, but a more effective system for ballast water management uses a combination of methods,” says Lorne Thomas, the external affairs officer for the Ninth Coast Guard District which encompasses the Great Lakes.

The BallastSolution is an improvement for several reasons, Wu said.  A ship isn’t able to completely remove all the water from its tank, so some fresh or brackish water is always left behind. Also, a diluted salt water solution remains in the ballast. This decreases the ability of the water to shock its intended targets.

Chemicals such as chorine, ozone and hydrogen peroxide can also treat ballast water.

Concerns about chemical use include unintended environmental impacts and the safety of storing and handling of potentially dangerous chemicals.

There are no long-term toxicity issues with the use of the BallastSolution, said Wu.

The Coast Guard is working to develop protocols to recognize and insure the treatment system a ship is using is working, Thomas said. Inspectors will question the crew on treatment operations and look at ship logs to insure treatments are taking place.

The Coast Guard won’t tell ship operators how to kill the organisms

It’s not the Coast Guard’s position to make these regulations, Thomas said. If a ship doesn’t have treatment equipment, the ship won’t be allowed to exchange its ballast water.

This would effectively prevent the possibly contaminated ship from entering into the Great Lakes.

Lakers are exempt from the ballast treatment requirement, said Glen Nekvasil, vice-president of Lake Carriers’ Association.

A laker on the water. Photo: epa.gov

 

“It’s a moot point,” he said. “There isn’t a treatment being made yet that would work with our ships. Flow rates, volumes, and the temperature of water make it difficult.

“Since our vessels never leave the Great Lakes we shouldn’t have to treat our ballast water,”  Nekvasil said. “If we stop ocean-going vessels from carrying them in, there wouldn’t be an issue.”

There are questions on the efficacy of treating ballast water on lakers, said Thomas. The Coast Guard intends to address this at some point. Room has been left in the regulations to eventually require lakers to treat their ballast water. Even though they don’t import invasive species, they can still move them from port to port within the lakes.

Meanwhile BallastSolution is looking for other companies to commercialize the technology, Wu said.

“There are several factors that will influence the cost of the system and this is an area I do not  have enough detail on yet to feel comfortable giving you an estimate,” Per Stromhaug, a Technology Transfer Coordinator for BallastSolution, wrote in an e-mail.

Prices could vary widely.

The cost depends on the size of a ship and the amount of retrofitting that needs to be done, said Wu.

7 thoughts on “Ballast blaster: Repelling invaders with sound

  1. Nico said,

    “The president is aasingt national ballast laws that are strong, like NY created, this is obvious by his support of the Coast Guard plan, creating more delay for another study to determine the amount of pathogens, virus, and invasive s allowed to be dumped into our waters, while mirroring the IMO. In NY it will be interesting to see after the elections if the state will wavier. Governor Patterson has been ask to step aside by the President. Will the new Governor do the right thing standing by NY’s current ballast laws? Despite a report created for the 111th Congress in Dec 2009 stating that national ballast water legislation would cause the cost of imports to rise as a results of having to retrofit mainly foreign ships with technology, the president had a public rift about job creation with rep Oberstar, who has been instrumental in previous attempts to create national ballast legislation, while the president supports Senator Boxer who killed rep Oberstar’s legislation for the change we needed in 2008 to protect our nations waters from foreign ships. The idea that the different aspects of ballast dumping such as toxic materials can be controlled by the Clean Water Act, and the EPA, is a joke as tar balls entering Lake Pontchartrain through ballast systems was not even checked during the Gulf disaster, despite this administration receiving repeated warnings of ballast system having the potential to be problematic. Under this administration neither the EPA nor the Coast Guard enforced the Clean Water Act.”

    Sounds familiar, you go Nico good job!

  2. Pingback: Zapping Invasives reprint from The Great Lakes Echo « The Dynamic Great Lakes Blog

  3. Pingback: Shipboard ultra-violet light repels Isle Royale invaders | Great Lakes Echo

  4. The president is aasingt national ballast laws that are strong, like NY created, this is obvious by his support of the Coast Guard plan, creating more delay for another study to determine the amount of pathogens, virus, and invasive s allowed to be dumped into our waters, while mirroring the IMO. In NY it will be interesting to see after the elections if the state will wavier. Governor Patterson has been ask to step aside by the President. Will the new Governor do the right thing standing by NY’s current ballast laws? Despite a report created for the 111th Congress in Dec 2009 stating that national ballast water legislation would cause the cost of imports to rise as a results of having to retrofit mainly foreign ships with technology, the president had a public rift about job creation with rep Oberstar, who has been instrumental in previous attempts to create national ballast legislation, while the president supports Senator Boxer who killed rep Oberstar’s legislation for the change we needed in 2008 to protect our nations waters from foreign ships. The idea that the different aspects of ballast dumping such as toxic materials can be controlled by the Clean Water Act, and the EPA, is a joke as tar balls entering Lake Pontchartrain through ballast systems was not even checked during the Gulf disaster, despite this administration receiving repeated warnings of ballast system having the potential to be problematic. Under this administration niether the EPA nor the Coast Guard enforced the Clean Water Act.

  5. Pingback: The Stream, June 7: Drugs and Hormones in Water Supplies | Circle of Blue WaterNews

  6. I wonder what type of flow rates (if any) were used during testing, and how those rates would compare to the flow rates of pumped ballast water. Also, what are the electrical requirements of the device? Will onboard electrical generators be sufficient, or will new ones be required…and how much fuel will they need? Lots of questions, but it sounds interesting. This could be the best use of GLRI money to date, but we should still stop ocean-going ships from going beyond Lake Ontario.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>